tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17722541.post6629379069938456727..comments2023-10-30T12:41:52.941+01:00Comments on don't code today what you can't debug tomorrow: Qt::CheatTransformAriya Hidayathttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03121582140059106015noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17722541.post-64755991782094945762010-06-12T13:42:33.601+02:002010-06-12T13:42:33.601+02:00Chart hasil pengujiannya dibuat pake apa tuh ? Kay...Chart hasil pengujiannya dibuat pake apa tuh ? Kayaknya kalo pake qtestlib-tool nggak gitu hasilnya ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17722541.post-72882341343961408142009-01-27T11:39:00.000+01:002009-01-27T11:39:00.000+01:00That certainly should be used by digikam for the t...That certainly should be used by digikam for the thumbnails, at the moment it's far too slow. <BR/><BR/>It should definitely replace fast transformation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17722541.post-26654458011161940622009-01-27T00:27:00.000+01:002009-01-27T00:27:00.000+01:00Seeing as it has better quality and it is faster, ...Seeing as it has better quality and it is faster, it should be the new fast transform I guess?xsachahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05783025524346320352noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17722541.post-57290185150395132992009-01-26T21:43:00.000+01:002009-01-26T21:43:00.000+01:00@Med: Image scaling code is being optimized as we ...@Med: Image scaling code is being optimized as we speak.<BR/><BR/>@Anonymous: find a link from http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2009/01/20/50-scaling-of-argb32-image/ :-)Ariya Hidayathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03121582140059106015noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17722541.post-14049141942177700642009-01-26T19:41:00.000+01:002009-01-26T19:41:00.000+01:00Hi,I have maybe a stupid question, but how did you...Hi,<BR/><BR/>I have maybe a stupid question, but how did you benchmark that?<BR/><BR/>mat69Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17722541.post-45971978388460725222009-01-26T13:40:00.000+01:002009-01-26T13:40:00.000+01:00I have a naive question, but given that it is fast...I have a naive question, but given that it is faster and better than the fast transformation, does it have a chance to replace it for Qt 4.6 or rather added as a supplemental option?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com