@Anonymous: Click on the picture. It's about automatic code-checking.
@Ariya: I've become doubts about some of the checks, esp. the explicitness of ctors. E.g. KSpread's Value and Region classes lost some part of their convenience.
@Anonymous: Click on the picture. It's about automatic code-checking.
@Ariya: I've become doubts about some of the checks, esp. the explicitness of ctors. E.g. KSpread's Value and Region classes lost some part of their convenience.
Stefan: better safe than sorry BUT you can always add some more constructors and assignment operators to increase the convenience factor AND/OR tag the constructors as 'implicit' with a comment (ask winter for details)
I have no idea what this is about.
ReplyDelete@Anonymous: Click on the picture. It's about automatic code-checking.
ReplyDelete@Ariya: I've become doubts about some of the checks, esp. the explicitness of ctors. E.g. KSpread's Value and Region classes lost some part of their convenience.
@Anonymous: Click on the picture. It's about automatic code-checking.
ReplyDelete@Ariya: I've become doubts about some of the checks, esp. the explicitness of ctors. E.g. KSpread's Value and Region classes lost some part of their convenience.
Grats! EBN does increase the overall quality of the KDE code base.
ReplyDeleteI for one would like to see more KDE apps !krazy
Stefan: better safe than sorry BUT you can always add some more constructors and assignment operators to increase the convenience factor AND/OR tag the constructors as 'implicit' with a comment (ask winter for details)
ReplyDelete